I donât want to instigate any toxicity, but that was actually a bit hard to read.
Anyway, some notable points to discuss:
But is there any way to continue your business without giving WHMCS a bunch of money that in a few years you can buy an expensive carâŚ
To be fair, if youâre spending THAT much on WHMCSâ licensing, you might be better off with a custom solution. (though costs for compliance, development time, maintenance, etc. will probably exceed the cost for WHMCSâ licensing lol)
But why didnât people choose Blesta instead of WHMCS before? Because it lacked the big community WHMCS has
(âŚ)
What about now? Things have changed.
I donât think the issue has gone away; while I wouldnât exactly rate WHMCSâ marketplace as âhigh quality,â (correct me if Iâm wrong here) I still have serious doubts regarding Blestaâs 3rd party support reaching parity with that of WHMCSâ community.
You briefly touch on this, but I would argue that the cheaper cost is more of a driver towards its adoption rather than the feature set (contrary to what you argue in the second half of the article).